Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

dehumidifier, the manufacturer also needs to take the cost of

a new chiller, or the extension of the existing chiller system,

into his investment calculation.

A look at the new, waterless DMS (Dry Mould System)

in a closed loop

The DMS unit dries air on the basis of the condensation prin-

ciple. The main difference to the standard systems is that the

DMS is not constantly dehumidifying hot and humid ambient

air. Instead, dry process air is circulated around the mould in a

closed loop, bringing the air back to the DMS unit. By doing

this, there is no necessity of using high cooling loads to dehu-

midify air, as the air returning to the DMS unit is partially dried.

This procedure allows the DMS to work without a pre-cooler

(chiller) and therefore no chilled water is needed for the DMS

dehumidification.

A state-of-the-art refrigerant compressor of the newest tech-

nology automatically reduces the needed cooling capacity, as

soon as reduction of moisture in the air is detected. Therefore,

the DMS only uses electricity for the actual cooling need of

the refrigerant system.

Model calculation: mould dehumidification with only 85 %

lower energy consumption, compared to conventional systems

Standard dehumidification systems on the market are supplied

with a water pre-cooler. The DMS units do not need the chilled

water for pre-cooling, which automatically reduces overall in-

vestment costs for such a system between 15.000 and 20.000

Euros. A pre-cooler in standard systems, requires only 66 %

or less of the overall energy normally needed.

By cutting out the pre-cooler, immense cost and energy sav-

ings can be achieved. In production, the actual savings can

seen: For example, a dehumidification unit with a desiccant

wheel and a process air volume of 1.800 Nm³/h needs a cool-

ing capacity of 38.700 kcal/h (45 kW) (calculated at ambient

conditions of 35°C/ 60% rel. hum.), which adds up to 45 / 3

= 15 kW of electrical energy needed to run the chiller. For the

regeneration heater, blower and motors, an additional 20 kW

of electrical energy is needed for the dehumidifier. The total

electrical consumption of the dehumidification and the elec-

tricity for the chiller adds up to 15 kW/h + 20 kW/h = 35 kW/h.

This is a large amount of energy when compared to the DMS

unit, which runs with an average of 5 kW, as only electrical

energy is needed for the refrigerant compressor and the ven-

tilators. The difference of 30 kW/h or in other words, 86 %

reduction, is extreme.

If you calculate for example 0,15 EUR/kW and consider a 24/7

production with 168 hours production time per week, the im-

mensity of the savings becomes clear: 30 kW x 0,15 x 168 h

= 756 EUR per week, or 3.024,00 EUR per month (á 4 weeks).

Hard earned money is saved so easily, day by day, every day. It

is just as easy to calculate the short amortization time of the

DMS unit.

Effective mould drying with the DMS means

you save large amounts of energy, too

The installation of the DMS unit is easy and effective. The in-

stallation of insulated water pipes to and from the chilled

water source is no longer necessary. Only the connection to

the electricity supply is required. With the application of re-

frigerant compressors and ventilators of the youngest gener-

ation, significant energy savings can be achieved. These

systems control and adapt the required cooling capacity to the

ambient conditions, with the help of intelligent sensor tech-

nology. If the chilled water capacity is not enough, with the

DMS application, no extra investment into an additional chilled

water supply is necessary. The manufacturer has the advan-

tage of saving double, once with the investment and a sec-

Condensation-free production conditions with the DMS unit:

dry air circulates around the mould in an enclosed

environment – more performance, less energy and

consistent product quality

Uniform product

quality with

condensation-free

production

conditions

Extrusion International 3/2016

38